Experimental studies on Influence of different doses of Vermicompost on essential oil yield of Ocimum tenuiflorum var. CIM-Ayu
A. Ranganadha Reddy1*, R. Bharath Kumar1, T. C. Venkateswarulu1, M. Indira1, D. Ramyakrishna1, M. Deepthi1, K. P. Sastry2
1School of Biotechnology, Vignan University, Vadlamudi, Guntur 522 213, Andhra Pradesh, India
2CIMAP Uppal, Hyderabad 500 039, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Corresponding Author E-mail : rangaaluri@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Vermicompost is a naturally occurring organic biofertilizer and it contains 1.5 – 2.5 % Nitrogen, 0.9 – 1.7 % Phosphorus, 1.5 – 2.4 % Potash, 0.5 – 1.0 % Calcium, 0.2 – 0.3 % Magnesium, 0.4 - 0.5 % Sulphur. Ocimum tenuiflorum yields aromatic oil containing eugenol (71.3%). The present study focused on the influence of different doses of vermicompost on the essential oil yield of Ocimum tenuiflorum var. CIM-Ayu. In the experiment, six different doses of vermicompost (0- 3.0 tons/ha) was applied and during the course of investigation the essential oil from the herbs was collected at two different stages (i.e. at 45, 90 days after planting) and it was noticed that the essential content did not follow any particular pattern. Similarly, the chemical constituents of the oil were not influenced by the treatments. It was also observed that reduction in plant height and number of tillers/clump that was manifested in reduced herb yield was compensated by a higher oil concentration in the leaves. The highest content of Eugenol, was reported in addition to Methyl Eugenol, Beta Elemene and Caryophyllene.
KEYWORDS: Ocimum tenuiflorum, Vermicompost, Essential oil, Eugenol, Methyl Eugenol, Beta Elemene and Caryophyllene.
INTRODUCTION:
Ocimum tenuiflorum (Krishna Tulasi) belonging to the family Lamiaceae (labiate) [1] is a medicinal [2] and aromatic crop that is thought to have originated in north central India and now grows native throughout the eastern world tropics, which yields essential oil and aroma chemicals and find diverse uses in the perfumery and cosmetic industries as well as in indigenous systems of medicine.[3][4] Out of 160 species of Ocimum, recorded in India, Ocimum tenuiflorum Linn is cultivated in India on a commercial scale. It is grown in various parts of the country viz. in west Bengal, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Jammu, Assam etc.[5]
Essential oil of Ocimum tenuiflorum contained higher amount of linalool (39.39-55.26%) and moderate amounts of methyl chavicol (0-6.66%), nerol (0.48-8.0%), geraniol (0.26-1.75%) and citral (4.26-6.79%).[6] Recent analysis of the chemical constituents in the essential oils of Ocimum tenuiflorum revealed the presence of α-humulene (0.71%), germacrene D (2.11-4.91%), β-elemene (1.59-6.35%), methyl eugenol (36.47-76.27%) and β-caryophyllene (8.71-56.63%).[7] The essential oils, mainly used in food industries, perfumery, and also possess anti-bacterial and insecticidal properties. It inhibits the in vitro growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Micrococcus pyrogenes variety aureus. It has marked insecticidal activity against mosquitoes. Vermi compost improve herbs quality foliage yield, essential oil content, and oil yield Vermi compost contains Nitrogen, Phosphorous, Potassium, Calcium, Sulphur and Magnesium- Conserved Nutrients from Nature. Vermicompost is the product obtained by composting organic residues using earth worms.[8] Earth worms like Edudrilus eugeniae, Eistenia fetida and Perionyx erxcauatus have been identified as the organisms to process the biodegradable organic material.[9] The chemical composition of basil oil is reported as -pinene 0.1-0.4%, camphene 0.02-0.1%, ßpinene 0.07-0.8%, myrcene 0.12-0.8%, limonene 2.0-9.3%, cis-ocimene 0.1-0.6%, p-cymene 0.05-0.15%, cis-3-hexenol 0.02-0.08%, fenchyl acetate 0.1-0.5%,camphor 0.37-0.75%, linalool 40-54%, fenchyl alcohol 2-9%, methyl chavicol 23-26%, -terpineol 0.8-1.9%, citronellol 0.65-3.7%, geraniol 0.03-0.30%, methyl cinnamate 0.05-0.34% and eugenol 5-12%.[10]
Table-1: Physico-chemical properties of the sweet basil oil [11]
|
Assay of GLC: |
Comparable to standard [methyl chavicol (71% to 75%) Linalout (18% to 24%) traces 4-10%] |
|
Appearance: |
Pale yellow liquid |
|
Refractive index: |
1.453 to 1.655 |
|
Saponification value: |
2.0000 to 8.0000 |
|
Specific Gravity: |
0.9320 to o.9830 |
|
Optical Rotatim: |
- 4 to -8 |
|
Specific Gravity: |
0.9320 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Material:
Fully grown slips of size 4-6” were planted in field at 60x60 cm spacing in 3x4 m plots as per the lay out plan.
Ocimum tenuiflorum var. CIM-Ayu were collected from the experimental garden of CIMAP, Hyderabad and other chemical are analytical grade, NSP chemicals.
Methods:
Experiment I: Different doses of Vermicompost were applied in the following composition on herb Ocimum tenuiflorum var. CIM-Ayu”
Table-2: Different levels of vermicompost applications
|
S NO |
Treatment |
Vermicompost tons/ha |
Vermicompost Kg/plot |
|
1. |
T1 |
Control |
Control |
|
2. |
T2 |
3.00 |
7.20 |
|
3. |
T3 |
1.50 |
3.60 |
|
4. |
T4 |
1.00 |
2.40 |
|
5. |
T5 |
0.75 |
1.80 |
|
6 |
T6 |
0.50 |
1.45 |
Note: The treatment composition of vermicompost was taken as 3.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.75, 0.50 tons/ha.
Table-3: Shows the replication of treatments with Vermicompost correspondingly the information has been provided in parenthesis.
|
T1 Control |
|||
|
R1T1 (Control) |
R2T1 (Control) |
R3T1 (Control) |
R4T1 (Control) |
|
R1T2 7.20 Kg VC |
R2T2 7.20 Kg VC |
R3T2 7.20 Kg VC |
R4T2 7.20 Kg VC |
|
R1T3 3.60 Kg VC |
R2T3 3.60 Kg VC |
R3T3 3.60 Kg VC |
R4T3 3.60 Kg VC |
|
R1T4 2.40 Kg VC |
R2T4 2.40 Kg VC |
R3T4 2.40 Kg VC |
R4T4 2.40 Kg VC |
|
R1T5 1.80 Kg VC |
R2T5 1.80 Kg VC |
R3T5 1.80 Kg VC |
R4T5 1.80 Kg VC |
|
R1T6 1.45Kg VC |
R2T6 1.45Kg VC |
R3T6 1.45Kg VC |
R4T6 1.45Kg VC |
(VC: Vermicompost, T: treatment, R: replication)
Experiment –I
Treatment imposition:
The crop was planted in garden on 10.10.2010. Vermicompost as per treatments was applied 10 days after planting.
Maintenance:
The crop was kept weed free and regularly irrigated.
Observations on essential oil yield:
Observations were taken at different intervals starting from 10 days after vermicompost application. In each treatment five plants were removed at random from the plants and washed under tap water. The plants were partitioned in to lamina, petiole and stem. Fresh and dry weights of individual components were taken separately. Later observations were recorded. Details about the observations recorded are presented here (see Table-4):
Table-4: Table showing the different stages of fresh plant samples was collected at regular intervals of time i.e., (30, 60, 90, 120 days)
|
S.No |
Regular intervals |
Code |
|
1 |
30 |
Stage I |
|
2 |
60 |
Stage II |
|
3 |
90 |
Stage III |
|
4 |
120 |
Stage IV |
Oil content and quality:
At 45, 90 days after planting leaf samples were collected and separated in to small branches. 250 g leaves were weighed and using a Clevenger apparatus the oil content was estimated. .
Statistical Analysis:
The data generated in this study were statistically analyzed following the procedure described by Mandal and Numbiar (1999)[11][16]. The results are presented and discussed at 5 % probability level uniformly. The non significant results are denoted as N.S and * indicates the significant results. In the statistical analysis, F'-Test was performed with the difference between the highest and
lowest average values. If the difference is more than C.D value, then it is significant and if it is less than C.D value, then it is non significant.
Gas Chromatography parameters:
Lemon grass short method:
GC analysis was carried out using Varian CP-3800 with Galaxie chromatography data system fitted with flame ionization detector (FID) and an electronic integrator. Separation of the compounds was achieved employing a Varian CP-Sil 5CB capillary column (ID: 50 m X 0.25 mm; film thickness 0.25 µm) with 5% dimethyl polysiloxane. Nitrogen was the carrier gas at 0.5 ml/min constant flow rate. The column temperature program was: 1200C (2 min) to 2400C (6 min) at 80C/min ramp rate. The injector and detector temperature were 2500C and 3000C, respectively. Samples (0.2 µL) were injected with a 20:80:20 split ratio. Retention indices were generated with a standard solution of n-alkanes (C6-C15). Peak areas and retention times were measured by an electronic integrator. The relative amounts of individual compounds were computed from GC peak areas without FID response factor correction. [13][14][15]
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Essential Oil characteristics: During the course of investigation the essential oil from the herbs was collected at three different stages and it was noticed that the essential content did not follow any particular pattern (Table-5 and Figure-1). Similarly, the chemical constituents of the oil were not influenced by the treatments (Table-6, 8, and10).
Table-5: Influence of different levels of Vermicompost on the Oil content (%) at different stages.
|
Treatment |
days after planting |
|
|
I |
II |
|
|
T1 |
0.21 |
0.24 |
|
T2 |
0.23 |
0.28 |
|
T3 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
|
T4 |
0.25 |
0.34 |
|
T5 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
|
T6 |
0.21 |
0.31 |
|
F'- Test |
* |
* |
|
C.D.(P=0.05) |
0.027 |
0.036 |
|
C.V.% |
8.18 |
8.575 |
Quantity of essential oil volume yielding in different stages at 45,90 days after vermicompost application. It has been observed that reduction in plant height and number of leaves that was manifested in reduced herb yield was compensated by a higher oil concentration in the leaves.
|
Figure-1: Influence of different levels of Vermicompost on the essential Oil content (% ) of Ocimum tenuiflorum var. CIM-Ayu at different days after planting
An increase in essential oil content was noticed upto 90 days in all the treatments. The essential oil content noticed at observation three was less because the observation was taken during growth period. It was observed that the essential oil content did not follow any particular pattern.
Chemical constituents of the oil:
Influence of different levels of vermicompost on the chemical constituents of essential oil. Stage I– Chemical constituents of the oil after every 45 days
It has been also observed that, the oil content and chemical composition of oil did not change with regard to influence of the age of the crop.( after every 45 days)
|
Compounds |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
|
Methyl Eugenol |
6.027 |
0.177 |
0.159 |
0.698 |
0.917 |
0.161 |
|
Linalool |
0.302 |
0.195 |
0.324 |
0.537 |
0.391 |
0.266 |
|
Limonene |
0.175 |
0.356 |
0.586 |
1.368 |
0.328 |
0.289 |
|
Methyl Chavicol |
0.733 |
0.540 |
0.611 |
0.816 |
0.691 |
0.514 |
|
Beta Elemene |
6.748 |
13.251 |
11.682 |
8.867 |
11.783 |
11.861 |
|
Caryophyllene |
7.591 |
10.994 |
14.805 |
13.006 |
11.829 |
12.197 |
|
Eugenol |
45.024 |
70.080 |
66.441 |
65.614 |
65.334 |
69.580 |
Figure-2: GC Analysis for Vermicompost application of Plant samples after 45 days
In the above graph, the highest content of the Eugenol , Limonene, Linalool, Methyl Chavicol, Methyl Eugenol, Beta Elemene and Caryophyllene was present in the essential oil component. It has been represented where as in X-axis Retention Time (RT), min.and Y-axis Height of the peak (µV) (refer to Figure-2).
Table -7: Chemical Composition of oil after 45 days of Vermicompost application
|
S.No |
Name |
Time [Min] |
Quantity [% Area] |
Height [µV] |
Area [µV.Min] |
Area % [%] |
|
1 |
Unknown |
0.03 |
0.03 |
69.7 |
1.8 |
0.027 |
|
2 |
Unknown |
5.73 |
0.03 |
61.8 |
2.2 |
0.034 |
|
3 |
Unknown |
5.82 |
0.49 |
937.6 |
32 |
0.492 |
|
4 |
Unknown |
5.9 |
0.01 |
11.2 |
0.7 |
0.01 |
|
5 |
Unknown |
6.87 |
0.33 |
441.7 |
21.5 |
0.331 |
|
6 |
Unknown |
7.24 |
0.02 |
54.4 |
1.5 |
0.023 |
|
7 |
Unknown |
7.29 |
0 |
13.6 |
0.2 |
0.002 |
|
8 |
Unknown |
7.65 |
0.02 |
31.2 |
1.2 |
0.018 |
|
9 |
Unknown |
7.72 |
1.17 |
2541.8 |
76.2 |
1.172 |
|
10 |
Unknown |
7.81 |
0.07 |
126.2 |
4.3 |
0.066 |
|
11 |
Unknown |
7.89 |
0.47 |
994.8 |
30.6 |
0.471 |
|
12 |
Unknown |
8.02 |
0.38 |
663.9 |
24.9 |
0.384 |
|
13 |
Unknown |
8.14 |
0.37 |
787.2 |
24.4 |
0.375 |
|
14 |
Unknown |
8.46 |
0.05 |
89.6 |
3.2 |
0.049 |
|
15 |
Limonene |
8.63 |
1.37 |
2041.3 |
88.9 |
1.368 |
|
16 |
Unknown |
8.74 |
0.3 |
594.1 |
19.6 |
0.302 |
|
17 |
Unknown |
8.98 |
0.03 |
47.6 |
2.1 |
0.033 |
|
18 |
Linalool |
9.19 |
0.54 |
1028.6 |
34.9 |
0.537 |
|
19 |
Unknown |
9.25 |
0.07 |
146.4 |
4.6 |
0.07 |
|
20 |
Unknown |
9.35 |
0.02 |
22.4 |
1.3 |
0.02 |
|
21 |
Unknown |
9.99 |
0.04 |
63.7 |
2.3 |
0.035 |
|
22 |
Unknown |
10.21 |
0.02 |
26.5 |
1.2 |
0.018 |
|
23 |
Methyl chavicol |
10.32 |
0.82 |
1545.1 |
53.1 |
0.816 |
|
24 |
Unknown |
10.51 |
0.49 |
817.6 |
32.1 |
0.494 |
|
25 |
Unknown |
11.05 |
0.04 |
65.3 |
2.5 |
0.038 |
|
26 |
Unknown |
11.42 |
0.07 |
145.5 |
4.8 |
0.074 |
|
27 |
Unknown |
11.95 |
0.14 |
150.8 |
8.9 |
0.136 |
|
28 |
Unknown |
12.57 |
0.16 |
191.6 |
10.6 |
0.163 |
|
29 |
Eugenol |
12.77 |
65.61 |
122785.4 |
4263.3 |
65.614 |
|
30 |
Methyl eugenol |
13.26 |
0.7 |
1341.4 |
45.4 |
0.698 |
|
31 |
Unknown |
13.65 |
0.55 |
1042.6 |
35.9 |
0.552 |
|
32 |
Beta elemene |
13.76 |
8.87 |
16650.1 |
576.1 |
8.867 |
|
33 |
Caryophyllene |
14.35 |
13.01 |
24559.7 |
845.1 |
13.006 |
|
34 |
Unknown |
14.5 |
0.01 |
14.2 |
0.8 |
0.012 |
|
35 |
Unknown |
14.83 |
1.14 |
1440.4 |
74 |
1.14 |
|
36 |
Unknown |
15.04 |
0.12 |
150.5 |
7.8 |
0.12 |
|
37 |
Unknown |
15.17 |
0.07 |
52.3 |
4.6 |
0.071 |
|
38 |
Unknown |
15.29 |
0.21 |
356.2 |
13.5 |
0.208 |
|
39 |
Unknown |
15.4 |
0.27 |
418.2 |
17.4 |
0.268 |
|
40 |
Unknown |
15.67 |
0.02 |
54.2 |
1.5 |
0.023 |
|
41 |
Unknown |
15.74 |
0.03 |
46.1 |
1.7 |
0.026 |
|
42 |
Unknown |
15.79 |
0.02 |
40.2 |
1.2 |
0.019 |
|
43 |
Unknown |
16.61 |
0.12 |
195.5 |
7.8 |
0.12 |
|
44 |
Unknown |
16.77 |
0.16 |
75.8 |
10.3 |
0.158 |
|
45 |
Unknown |
16.99 |
0.06 |
50.2 |
4 |
0.062 |
|
46 |
Unknown |
17.53 |
0.05 |
72 |
3.2 |
0.05 |
|
47 |
Unknown |
17.68 |
0.16 |
98.6 |
10.1 |
0.156 |
|
48 |
Unknown |
20.75 |
1.27 |
821.9 |
82.6 |
1.271 |
|
Total |
100 |
183976.5 |
6497.6 |
100 |
The chemical composition contents was present in above mentioned table shows that the out of 48 unknown samples the only seven components (viz. Eugenol ,Limonene, Linalool, Methyl Chavicol, Methyl Eugenol, Beta Elemene and Caryophyllene) were shown the considerable enhancement in terms of quantity after adding the required quantity (2.40 kg/Plot) vermicompost application.( see Table-7)
Stage II -Chemical constituents of the oil after every 90 days
Table-8: Quantity of oil after every 90 days of Vermicompost application.
|
Compounds |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
|
Linalool |
0.363 |
0.418 |
0.424 |
0.341 |
0.302 |
0.330 |
|
Limonene |
0.665 |
0.673 |
1.410 |
0.555 |
0.474 |
0.490 |
|
Methyl Chavicol |
0.720 |
0.576 |
0.695 |
0.568 |
0.463 |
0.533 |
|
Beta Elemene |
11.031 |
13.394 |
8.110 |
9.282 |
11.748 |
10.521 |
|
Caryophyllene |
18.322 |
17.822 |
19.967 |
15.205 |
11.288 |
18.012 |
|
Methyl Eugenol |
1.049 |
0.098 |
28.126 |
8.307 |
0.127 |
0.099 |
|
Eugenol |
61.163 |
60.665 |
33.558 |
61.145 |
71.509 |
65.250 |
Figure-3: GC Analysis for Vermicompost application of Plant samples after 90 days
It has been also observed that, the oil content and chemical composition of oil did not change with regard to influence of the age of the crop.( after every 45 days.)
In the above graph, the highest content of the Eugenol ,Limonene, Linalool, Methyl Chavicol, Methyl Eugenol, Beta Elemene and Caryophyllene was present in the essential oil omponent. It has been represented where as in X-axis Retention Time (RT), min.and Y-axis Height of the peak (µV).( refer to Figure-3)
Table-9:Chemical Composition of oil after 90 days of Vermicompost application
|
S.No |
Name |
Time [Min] |
Quantity [% Area] |
Height [µV] |
Area [µV.Min] |
Area % [%] |
|
1 |
Unknown |
5.87 |
0.25 |
2994.8 |
113.4 |
0.249 |
|
2 |
Unknown |
6.08 |
0.01 |
127.8 |
5.9 |
0.013 |
|
3 |
Unknown |
6.67 |
0.01 |
111.2 |
4.5 |
0.01 |
|
4 |
Unknown |
6.87 |
0.16 |
1581.4 |
72.9 |
0.16 |
|
5 |
Unknown |
7.16 |
0.01 |
110.2 |
3.9 |
0.009 |
|
6 |
Unknown |
7.24 |
0.01 |
149.5 |
5.1 |
0.011 |
|
7 |
Unknown |
7.59 |
0.01 |
138.8 |
4.3 |
0.009 |
|
8 |
Unknown |
7.72 |
1.17 |
16570.4 |
534.8 |
1.174 |
|
9 |
Unknown |
7.81 |
0.05 |
636.4 |
21.6 |
0.047 |
|
10 |
Unknown |
7.88 |
0.35 |
4934.8 |
161 |
0.353 |
|
11 |
Unknown |
8.02 |
0.38 |
4684 |
171 |
0.375 |
|
12 |
Unknown |
8.14 |
0.28 |
3866.1 |
125.4 |
0.275 |
|
13 |
Unknown |
8.46 |
0.07 |
973.7 |
32.9 |
0.072 |
|
14 |
Limonene |
8.63 |
1.41 |
10661.1 |
642.6 |
1.41 |
|
15 |
Unknown |
8.74 |
0.76 |
10224 |
344.1 |
0.755 |
|
16 |
Unknown |
8.86 |
0.03 |
192.4 |
11.5 |
0.025 |
|
17 |
Unknown |
8.98 |
0.03 |
258.7 |
13.1 |
0.029 |
|
18 |
Linalool |
9.19 |
0.42 |
5086.8 |
193.1 |
0.424 |
|
19 |
Unknown |
9.25 |
0.1 |
1361.4 |
47.2 |
0.104 |
|
20 |
Unknown |
9.33 |
0.02 |
138.4 |
7.2 |
0.016 |
|
21 |
Unknown |
9.67 |
0.01 |
126 |
4.2 |
0.009 |
|
22 |
Unknown |
9.77 |
0.02 |
187.6 |
8.1 |
0.018 |
|
23 |
Unknown |
9.99 |
0.07 |
710 |
33 |
0.072 |
|
24 |
Unknown |
10.21 |
0.03 |
259.2 |
11.9 |
0.026 |
|
25 |
Methyl chavicol |
10.32 |
0.69 |
8964.5 |
316.5 |
0.695 |
|
26 |
Unknown |
10.43 |
0.03 |
314.1 |
13.8 |
0.03 |
|
27 |
Unknown |
10.51 |
0.36 |
2862 |
164.5 |
0.361 |
|
28 |
Unknown |
11.42 |
0.02 |
240.1 |
9.2 |
0.02 |
|
29 |
Unknown |
11.95 |
0.02 |
247.2 |
8.5 |
0.019 |
|
30 |
Unknown |
12.02 |
0.01 |
72.1 |
3.2 |
0.007 |
|
31 |
Unknown |
12.15 |
0.02 |
305.8 |
10.6 |
0.023 |
|
32 |
Unknown |
12.24 |
0.01 |
103.5 |
5.6 |
0.012 |
|
33 |
Eugenol |
12.79 |
33.56 |
351512.5 |
15289.6 |
33.558 |
|
34 |
Unknown |
13.03 |
0.06 |
147 |
27.8 |
0.061 |
|
35 |
Methyl eugenol |
13.29 |
28.13 |
316007.4 |
12814.6 |
28.126 |
|
36 |
Unknown |
13.58 |
0.02 |
140.9 |
8.6 |
0.019 |
|
37 |
Unknown |
13.65 |
0.49 |
6419.8 |
224.1 |
0.492 |
|
38 |
Beta elemene |
13.76 |
8.11 |
103937.9 |
3695.2 |
8.11 |
|
39 |
Unknown |
14.12 |
0.03 |
369.4 |
15.6 |
0.034 |
|
40 |
Caryophyllene |
14.36 |
19.97 |
249302.5 |
9097.2 |
19.967 |
|
41 |
Unknown |
14.58 |
0.15 |
685.1 |
67.9 |
0.149 |
|
42 |
Unknown |
14.83 |
1.11 |
13976.6 |
504.4 |
1.107 |
|
43 |
Unknown |
15.05 |
0.04 |
389.9 |
16.7 |
0.037 |
|
44 |
Unknown |
15.12 |
0.01 |
90.9 |
3.7 |
0.008 |
|
45 |
Unknown |
15.17 |
0.03 |
190.8 |
12 |
0.026 |
|
46 |
Unknown |
15.29 |
0.1 |
1159.2 |
46.2 |
0.101 |
|
47 |
Unknown |
15.4 |
0.11 |
1349.4 |
50 |
0.11 |
|
48 |
Unknown |
15.45 |
0.04 |
375.3 |
16.3 |
0.036 |
|
49 |
Unknown |
15.58 |
0.03 |
248.8 |
14.7 |
0.032 |
|
50 |
Unknown |
15.67 |
0.05 |
648.1 |
24.5 |
0.054 |
|
51 |
Unknown |
15.74 |
0.05 |
401 |
21.1 |
0.046 |
|
52 |
Unknown |
15.79 |
0.03 |
333.7 |
12.8 |
0.028 |
|
53 |
Unknown |
15.85 |
0.04 |
274.6 |
18.6 |
0.041 |
|
54 |
Unknown |
16 |
0.02 |
195.7 |
9.9 |
0.022 |
|
55 |
Unknown |
16.38 |
0.01 |
77.4 |
2.7 |
0.006 |
|
56 |
Unknown |
16.55 |
0.03 |
356.1 |
12.7 |
0.028 |
|
57 |
Unknown |
16.61 |
0.25 |
3003.7 |
113.1 |
0.248 |
|
58 |
Unknown |
16.76 |
0.1 |
839.3 |
45.9 |
0.101 |
|
59 |
Unknown |
16.94 |
0.05 |
279.1 |
23.8 |
0.052 |
|
60 |
Unknown |
17.26 |
0.05 |
372.4 |
24.1 |
0.053 |
|
61 |
Unknown |
17.53 |
0.07 |
445.6 |
33.9 |
0.074 |
|
62 |
Unknown |
17.64 |
0.02 |
135.1 |
7.8 |
0.017 |
|
63 |
Unknown |
17.93 |
0.01 |
108.5 |
6 |
0.013 |
|
64 |
Unknown |
18.21 |
0.03 |
262.1 |
12.8 |
0.028 |
|
65 |
Unknown |
18.47 |
0.09 |
652.2 |
39.1 |
0.086 |
|
66 |
Unknown |
19.37 |
0.3 |
673.1 |
135.5 |
0.297 |
|
67 |
Unknown |
19.85 |
0.02 |
96.7 |
7.9 |
0.017 |
|
Total |
100 |
1134652 |
45561.4 |
100 |
The chemical composition contents was present in above mentioned table shows that the out of 67 unknown samples the only seven components (viz. Eugenol ,Limonene, Linalool, Methyl Chavicol, Methyl Eugenol, Beta Elemene and Caryophyllene) were shown the considerable enhancement in terms of quantity after adding the required quantity (2.40 kg/Plot) vermicompost application.( refer Table-9)
CONCLUSIONS:
The influence of vermicompost on the essential oil yield of ocimum at two different stages (i.e. 45 and 90 days) was studied by using standardization method of oil analysis it was observed that the essential oil content did not follow any particular pattern. The eugenol content of the oil was higher due to vermicompost application.
REFERENCES:
1 Simon, J.E., A.F. Chadwick, and L.E. Craker. 1984. Basil. In:Herbs: An indexed bibliography, 1971-1980. Archon Books.
2 Bast F, Rani P, Meena D. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of holy basil (Ocimum tenuiflorum) in Indian subcontinent.ScientificWorldJournal.2014;847–482.
3 Krishnan R. Natural outcrossing in sweet basil-Ocimum basilicum L. Indian Perfumer, 1981; 25(3and4): 74-77.
4 Joy, P.P., Thomas, J., Mathew, S., Jose, G. and Joseph, J. Aromatic plants. Tropical Horticulture Vol. 2. (eds. Bose, T.K., Kabir, J., Das, P. and Joy, P.P.). Naya Prokash, Calcutta, 2001;633-733
5 Sobti SN. and Pushpangadan P. Studies in the Genus Ocimum : to genetics, Breeding and Production of New Strains of economic Importance, in CK. Atal and BM Kapur (eds), Cultivation and Utilization of Aromatic Plants. RRL, CSIR, Jammu-Tawi, 1982 :457-472.
6 Omer E.A., Elsayed A-G.A., El-Lathy A., Khattab M.E., Sabra A.S., Effect of the nitrogen fertilizer forms and time of their application on the yield of herb and essential oil of Ocimum americanum L. Herba Pol. 2008; 54(1):34–46.
7 Vani, S.R., S.F. Cheng and C.H. Chuah, Comparative Study of Volatile Compounds from Genus Ocimum. Am. J. Applied Sci. 2009; 6(3): 523-528.
8 Gandhi, M., Sangwan, V., Kapoor, K.K. and Dilbaghi, N. Composting of household wastes with and without earthworms. Environment and Ecology., 1997; 15(2): 432-434.
9 Patil, S.L and Sheelavantar M.N. Effect of moisture conservation practices, organic sources and nitrogen levels on yield, water use and root development of rabi sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)] in the vertisols of semiarid tropics. Annals of Agricultural Research., 2000; 21(21) :32–36.
10 Kumar, A., Sharma, A. and Virmani, O. P. Cultivation and utilization of rose geranium: A review. Cur. Res. Med. Arom.Plants., 1985; 7(3):137-147.
11 A. Ranganadha Reddy, R. Bharath Kumar, Dr.V.Ravi Kumar, M. Deepthi, T. Naga Lohita ,M. Sriharsha, K.P. Sastry Experimental Studies on effect of Vermicompost and NPK on Essential oil yield of Ocimum tenuiflorum var. CIM-Ayu Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8(11):1519-1525
12 Risto Uusitalo, et al,. Effect of gypsum on the transfer of phosphorus and other nutrients through clay soil monoiliths, Agriculture and Food Science Journal., 2012; 21:260 – 278.
13 Ranganadha Reddy, V. Ravi Kumar, M. Priyanka, K.P. Sastry Experimental Studies on Influence of Different Doses of Gypsum on Essential Oil Yield of Lemongrass var. Krishna (Cymbopogon flexuosus) Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2014; 7(4):439-446.
14 Ranganadha Reddy, V. Ravi Kumar, R. Bharath Kumar, M.Priyanka, K.P. Sastry Experimental Studies on Influence of Different Doses of Sulphur on Essential Oil Yield of Lemongrass Var. Krishna (Cymbopogon flexuosus) Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2014; 7(8):856-863.
15 Nambiar, P. T. N and mandal R.C, Agricultural statistics :techniques and procedures, Agro Botanica Bikaner, 1999; 200P..
Received on 12.07.2016 Modified on 27.07.2016
Accepted on 10.08.2016 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2016; 9(12):2087-2093.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00425.X